The important thing to note is that the NET had objectivity
built in to its evaluation even before the June 2012 NET exam. Before the UGC
will evaluate only the objective papers of Paper 1 and Paper 2 to decide the
result. The non objective Paper 3 will be evaluated only for those who have
cleared Paper 1 and Paper 2. Therefore it is wrong for the Committee to have
deliberated on changing the pattern of the exam and thus to have changed the
pattern of Paper 3 from the earlier pattern that has been decided by an expert
committee. The employers had the feel of the candidates versatility to detailed
answers in the earlier pattern that is necessary in Humanities subjects. The
Paper 2 and Paper 3 are different in CSIR, though both may be objective. But
that is not the case with June 2012 NET exam pattern. There is a strong reason
to believe that this change has been done to effect certain malpractices. The
best way out now is to completely declare the June 2012 and December 2012
examinations as 'sub standard' and to discard these results. Let the UGC
conduct the examination in the old pattern again to these aspirants without
taking any application fee
Saturday, 16 March 2013
Let us pray to the Court to Scrap the June /Dec 2012 exam
Subscribe to:
Comments (Atom)